| |
Every country throughout the world has concerns and problems which are
continually being addressed by their various leaders. Countries in Africa
are no different.
As many of us know, industrializing countries consume
less than ten per cent (10%) of the world's annual output of mineral raw
materials. Yet, they produce thirty-three per cent (33%) of the total
output and possess forty per cent (40%) of all known reserves. Through
exports, which account for four fifths of their output, they supply fifty
per cent (50%) of the domestic requirements of industrialized nations
(both market oriented and centrally planned economies) and seventy per
cent (70%) of their import requirements. While these figures point up the
producer-consume dichotomy, they are in keeping with the obvious link
between development and raw material based production. Under-consumption
of raw materials of such proportions on the part of the industrializing
countries reflects their lack of industrialization.
Developing countries, in essence, are complaining less
about prices and more about their low industrialization levels. At the
heart of their argument is the proposition that they were denied
opportunities as well as means, such as technology, capital, an market
access to develop on all levels.
The African Scientific Institute (A.S.I.) thinks that
the most effective way to assist a people is to help them become
self-sufficient. For Black people, throughout the world, there is hope for
enhancements through constructive utilization of materials under their
control and through the establishment of an international "Brain Bank"
---- dedicated to help develop our resources.
While each country in Africa is unique and requires
specific solutions to respective problems, there are general problems
which exist in each country and require solutions which are common across
national boundaries. To resolve problems, each country must clearly state
which problems have highest priority. Many countries have attempted to do
so by initiating and developing plans. However, why many African countries
have so much difficulty overcoming inertia to effectively implement their
plans is baffling. Perhaps such difficulty can be attributed to incorrect
defining of problems, or incorrect prioritizing of problem solutions,
wrong solutions, insufficient or incorrect resources to implement
solutions, poor and/or incorrect leadership, or cultural impediments.
Whatever the reasons for the challenges to overcome
difficulties, the clarification of existing conditions, resources, and
problems, both specific and general, must be made prior to the initiation
of pragmatic solutions.
When it is clear what we want to do and in what order
of priority we want to initiate, develop, and implement solutions.........
then effective resources can be allocated to resolve problems.
Concerns,
problems, and solutions were addressed at the
AFRICA FOCUS Series, February and March, 1992 .
Pictures
This Conference Series:
• Addressed a host of problems and opportunities
from many international sources. From these same sources, you can assist
in developing a list of priorities for initiating achievable solutions for
short, intermediate, and long range goals.
• Identified available resources which assist in
Africa's development and bridge relations between Africans and African
Americans. No one wants to "reinvent the wheel" and minimize the
effectiveness available to address issues.
• Defined where many Africans and African Americans
are in relation to many dynamics of international forces in a rapidly
changing world.
• Identified international financial sources
interested in efforts to enhance African countries.
• Identified multinational corporations and
organizations operating in Africa.
• Initiated a databank of international resources
interested in African development.
Each workshop evaluated implementation processes
in relation to immediate, midrange, and long-range effects of changes
occurring throughout the world. Each country, whether in Africa, Europe,
past Soviet Bloc, the Americas, Asia, Mideast, etc. is seeking "its share"
of world resources.... finances, raw materials, human brainpower.
The goals of this series of conferences was 'organic' --- ever
growing with inputs from participants and attendees. However, the essence
of the conferences revolves around:
• Science and Technology
• Business and Finance
• Healthcare
• Human Resources Development
• Constituency Development
Contemporary conditions throughout the world
dictate that individuals can no longer isolate themselves and solve
localized problems while simultaneously assisting people in need
internationally.
If an organization is to be effective in helping to solve problems
which affects an entire people, then such an organization must work
closely with many individuals and organizations which are also attempting
to help that people.
The African Scientific Institute was committed to the success of
these series of conferences.
This conference represented an extension of the African Scientific
Institute's belief that a technical organization should do more than just
promote the development of only its membership. In pre-industrial times,
a technical association functioned mainly as a guild or a union. Its sole
purpose was to protect the social and economic positions, as well as the
technical secrets, of its members. A technical association should provide
a framework where new ideas can be explored, and where members and
non-members can interface and make contributions to society.
The AFRICA FOCUS Series of conferences
represented one such framework that the African Scientific Institute
provides for the public. Then the Institute joined in collaboration with
the International Foundation for Education and Self-Help (IFESH) and
Africare. Also, organizations such as the African American International
Economic and Trade Council joined in this collaborative. Then student
organizations such as the Black Engineering and Science Students
Association (BESSA) at the University of California, Berkeley, along with
the Society of Black Student Engineers (SBSE) at Stanford University
joined this vital partnership. They formulated the idea of conferences
that was broad in subject matter, international and interdisciplinary in
scope, and whose format would allow for both formal and informal contacts
among the participants and audience.
|
|